原文：
Serenity 白毛女-中文翻译（公开）
Serenity 白毛女-中文翻译（公开）
原文：
Bruh, when I first tried out ChatGPT around 2023, I thought it LLMs were garbage at coding.
3Y later, Mythos is considered a modern day “nuke” for cybersecurity.
People keep saying humanoids can’t do X or Y task today like plumbing or DC wiring. No sht, but it’s about where things are heading over the few years.
And it’s clear to me and VC apparently that we’ve just hit the inflection point where soon: majority of labor you think is human-only, can be replaced by robotics/humanoids.
You're already seeing this too with internal strategies: Remember $AMZN leaked strat planned to avoid hiring 600,000 workers by them with robots like $CCXI?
If you see past the "assistive robotics" public image framing to prevent protest, it's clear the goals is maximizing, opex efficiency.
The main areas I think are safe however are regulation bound (eg. Medicine), ultra specialized labor, or require human/emotional connections.
But I think you'll be blown away by the rate of change when frontier technologies become national security races between US and China... especially when China is currently in the lead.
翻译：
兄弟，当我第一次尝试ChatGPT，大约在2023年，我觉得LLM在编码方面很糟糕。
3年后，Mythos被认为是网络安全领域的现代“核武器”。
人们一直说人类无法完成某些任务，比如管道安装或直流电线安装。说实话，这是关于未来几年会发生什么。
很明显，对我和风险投资者来说，我们已经到了一个转折点，即：你认为只有人类才能完成的大部分劳动，很快就可以被机器人/人形机器人取代。
你已经在内部策略中看到这一点了：还记得$AMZN泄露的计划，想要通过使用机器人（如$CCXI）来避免雇用60万工人吗？
如果你看穿“辅助机器人”的公众形象包装，以防止抗议，你会发现目标是最大化运营效率。
然而，我认为安全的领域是那些受到监管限制的领域（例如医学），或需要超专业劳动力，或者需要人类/情感联系的领域。
但是，当边缘技术成为美国和中国之间的国家安全竞争时，我想你会被变化的速度惊呆，尤其是当中国目前处于领先地位时。
Bruh, when I first tried out ChatGPT around 2023, I thought it LLMs were garbage at coding.
3Y later, Mythos is considered a modern day “nuke” for cybersecurity.
People keep saying humanoids can’t do X or Y task today like plumbing or DC wiring. No sht, but it’s about where things are heading over the few years.
And it’s clear to me and VC apparently that we’ve just hit the inflection point where soon: majority of labor you think is human-only, can be replaced by robotics/humanoids.
You're already seeing this too with internal strategies: Remember $AMZN leaked strat planned to avoid hiring 600,000 workers by them with robots like $CCXI?
If you see past the "assistive robotics" public image framing to prevent protest, it's clear the goals is maximizing, opex efficiency.
The main areas I think are safe however are regulation bound (eg. Medicine), ultra specialized labor, or require human/emotional connections.
But I think you'll be blown away by the rate of change when frontier technologies become national security races between US and China... especially when China is currently in the lead.
翻译：
兄弟，当我第一次尝试ChatGPT，大约在2023年，我觉得LLM在编码方面很糟糕。
3年后，Mythos被认为是网络安全领域的现代“核武器”。
人们一直说人类无法完成某些任务，比如管道安装或直流电线安装。说实话，这是关于未来几年会发生什么。
很明显，对我和风险投资者来说，我们已经到了一个转折点，即：你认为只有人类才能完成的大部分劳动，很快就可以被机器人/人形机器人取代。
你已经在内部策略中看到这一点了：还记得$AMZN泄露的计划，想要通过使用机器人（如$CCXI）来避免雇用60万工人吗？
如果你看穿“辅助机器人”的公众形象包装，以防止抗议，你会发现目标是最大化运营效率。
然而，我认为安全的领域是那些受到监管限制的领域（例如医学），或需要超专业劳动力，或者需要人类/情感联系的领域。
但是，当边缘技术成为美国和中国之间的国家安全竞争时，我想你会被变化的速度惊呆，尤其是当中国目前处于领先地位时。
Could not load this section.